strategy+business is published by the global management consulting firm Booz & Company
 
or, sign in with:
strategy and business
Published: March 2, 2012
Page 1 2  | All | Next

 
 

The Soft Stuff Is the Hard Stuff

Douglas R. Conant, coauthor of TouchPoints: Creating Powerful Leadership Connections in the Smallest of Moments, introduces an excerpt from The 3rd Alternative: Solving Life’s Most Difficult Problems, by Stephen R. Covey, that proposes a more thoughtful approach for problem resolution.

In my 35-year corporate journey and my 60-year life journey, I have consistently found that the thorniest problems I face each day are soft stuff — problems of intention, understanding, communication, and interpersonal effectiveness — not hard stuff such as return on investment and other quantitative challenges. Inevitably, I have found myself needing to step back from the problem, listen more carefully, and frame the conflict more thoughtfully, while still finding a way to advance the corporate agenda empathetically. Most of the time, interestingly, this has led to a more promising path forward and a better relationship, which in turn has made the next conflict easier to deal with.

Stephen Covey provides a more direct approach to successful problem solving in the excerpt below from his new book. From the outset, his “3rd Alternative” approach engages everyone involved in an issue to advance the agenda in a winning way. The soft stuff will forever be the hard stuff, but leveraging 3rd Alternative thinking can make the soft stuff significantly easier to resolve productively.

— Douglas R. Conant

 


An excerpt from Chapter 3 of The 3rd Alternative: Solving Life’s Most Difficult Problems


 

If you’re a 3rd Alternative supervisor, you’ll neither flee nor fight. You’ll look for something better [when conflict arises], a solution that will provide your employee with a huge emotional payoff and create for the firm new and significant value.

A friend of mine explained how a 3rd Alternative leader dealt with exactly this situation in his life:

I was new at the job and had come in hoping for a better salary. I settled for something a lot less than I’d hoped for just to get in the door. But after a couple of months, it was clear that my family was struggling. We couldn’t get by because of some medical expenses. Besides that, I felt more and more that I was getting paid too little for the work I was doing. So I took a real risk and went to talk to the big boss about a raise. I didn’t know her very well and she didn’t know me. I had no real track record yet with that company.

But she invited me into her office and I explained why I was there. I was kind of surprised when she said, “Tell me more.” I told her about my family situation. She just listened, and I talked quite a lot about what I’d been doing for the firm. She asked me what I thought about the company, its customers, its products. It was odd. We had this long conversation that I thought was going to be about my pay, but instead was about me — how I was doing, what I thought, what I’d learned in my few months at the company.

Then she asked me about a certain customer I’d been working with. She wanted to know my ideas for expanding our business with that client, and I actually did have some thoughts that I shared.

A couple days later, she invited me back into her office. Three or four other people joined us, and she had put up on a whiteboard my ideas for this client. We had quite the discussion, and a lot more discussions after that. I was excited. Finally, they offered me an expanded job with higher pay and responsibility for a new level of service to this important client.

For my friend, these discussions were just the beginning of a swift rise in that company; he eventually became a partner to the “big boss.”

I’ve rarely heard of a wiser leader than this woman. She had a fine capacity for 3rd Alternative thinking. How easy it would have been for her either to fight my friend or just to give in to his request. Instead, she sensed the possibility of a dramatic win-win. Rather than haggling over the existing pie, she could envision the prospect of a much bigger pie. She suspected that combining my friend’s needs and energies with the client’s needs might well produce growth for everyone. The eventual result was a whole new line of business and a partner who increased his worth to the company every year. From what I know of this young man’s contribution to his firm, he was ultimately responsible for doubling its size.

 
Page 1 2  | All | Next
 
 
By David K. Waltz
The scenario outlined by Covey would not occur in firms under the thumb of their HR lawyers.
By Ralph Jacobson
As others noted, the Covey approach is not new, just new language. The solution assumes that if the manager simply takes a different tact, all will be well. In many instances this may work. However, the solution assumes that the locus of control is with the manager. Managers too work in a complex context. For example the organization hierarchy itself creates pressures on the manager to behave in certain ways. The presented scenario assumes the manager has the time, freedom, excess energy, etc. that is required to pull this off. If the manager does the right things, the right things will happen. I think the answers and direction provided here are too simplistic and don't take in the challenges that managers must face. It assumes the people are the problem rather than looking at the structure and system in which people have to work. We have had this kind of advice for decades....nothing new here....we need more.
By Jay Bitsack
On the surface, this story of a manager exercising her skill(s) in 3rd alternative (i.e., win/win solution) thinking, seems quite impressive and exemplifies what most would agree to as desired corporate behavior. And it may not have been reasonable for the author to publish all the details surrounding the organization in which this behavior took place. However, I have read so many of these types of stories and witnessed first-hand how such behaviors are not an accurate reflection of the dominant cultural behaviors being exhibited within an organization that I am inclined to dig a bit deeper. In this particular case, I am inclined to wonder why the opportunity that was ultimately offered to the low paid employee was not on the radar screen for this employee (and other potentially qualified employees) prior to his meeting? Yes, it could be that opportunity evolved as a result of the meeting; but that strikes me as being a very serendipitous set of circumstances.... so much so that it probably does not make for a good example. What if, the opportunity had not evolved... what would this employee's boss have done then? And why was the employee left in limbo for several days/weeks following the initial meeting? It seemed - based on the description of the interaction between the boss, the employee, and other stakeholders - that the employee was left wondering about the significance of the line of questioning and discussions he had been engaged in with his boss and other associates. It struck me that this employee's boss provided very little in the way of immediate feedback that might address the employee's issues. Was he made aware of the possible opportunity prior to being offered an expanded set of responsibilities, and if so, when? Without this type of information, the description of the interactions that took place seem at best to reflect an artificial construct, and at worst a parent-child type of interaction.
By Carlos André Spitzer
I would say the text showed us is quite interesting. Of course you will not find such kind of boss all over the Cos. but the idea is a real win / win one. I will take this into consideration, for sure. Thank you !
By Barbara Holtzman
Not to mention, it's not like there hasn't been anyone doing this before Mr. Covey decided to name it and claim it as his own idea. Interesting to see if it will catch on among those paying to read his book.
By humapuk
It's good to see Mary Follett's thinking and ideas about conflict resolution resurrected, just as as Fisher, Ury and Patton did in "Getting To Yes" They didn't credit her either.
By Marilena Favale
Nice text, just: slightly utopian. More often what you get is someone ready to stab you right in the back! which does not help dialogues......
Follow Us 
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google Plus RSS strategy+business Digital and Mobile products App Store

This Reviewer

  1. Douglas R. Conant is coauthor, with Mette Norgaard, of the New York Times bestseller TouchPoints: Creating Powerful Leadership Connections in the Smallest of Moments (Jossey-Bass, 2011). A sought-after speaker, he recently retired after a decade of service as the president, the CEO, and a director of Campbell Soup Company. Conant serves on the boards of nine nonprofit organizations, including the Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy, Catalyst, the National Organization on Disability, the Families and Work Institute, and the Partnership for Public Service.

This Excerpt

  1. The 3rd Alternative: Solving Life’s Most Difficult Problems (Free Press, 2011), by Stephen R. Covey with Breck England.
  2. Stephen R. Covey is an internationally respected leadership authority, organizational consultant, and author, whose books, which include The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People (Free Press, 1989), have sold more than 20 million copies. He is the cofounder and vice chairman of FranklinCovey, a global professional-services firm.