Skip to contentSkip to navigation

Consultation via Collaboration

When management consultants stop being experts and start being collaborators, companies benefit.

(originally published by Booz & Company)

Title:
What if We Shifted the Basis of Consulting from Knowledge to Knowing?
(Subscription or fee required.) 

Authors:
Jeff Hicks, Padmakumar Nair, and Celeste P. M. Wilderom

Publisher:
Management Learning, vol. 40, no. 3

Date Published: 
July 2009

Companies should consider making a fundamental shift in the way they think about management consulting, according to the authors of this paper. The current preference is for expert-based “knowledge,” meaning that consultants act as advisors to clients, providing outside diagnoses of problems. In many cases, these consultants’ suggestions are based on a well-defined body of academic and third-party research, but not necessarily on firsthand experience with the challenges faced. The consulting approach of “knowing” is more hands-on, involving close cooperation with the client company. One of the advantages of this method, the authors stress, is that information about a given business, industry sector, or project is not merely transferred from consultants to clients, but rather created during a process of active collaboration. When problems crop up, argue the authors, the collaborators have a mutual incentive to solve them — an approach that ultimately spreads more information, accountability, and knowledge throughout the entire team. 

Bottom Line:
Companies will benefit if management consultants shift their focus away from the traditional expert-driven approach and instead explore collaborative client–consultant projects.

Get s+b's award-winning newsletter delivered to your inbox. Sign up No, thanks
Illustration of flying birds delivering information
Get the newsletter

Sign up now to get our top insights on business strategy and management trends, delivered straight to your inbox twice a week.