strategy+business is published by PwC Strategy& Inc.
 
or, sign in with:
strategy and business
Published: May 30, 2006

 
 

The Future of Advertising Is Now

Accountable Revolutionaries
The growth of marketing communications during the 20th century was fertilized by a paradox. Beyond local experiments in retail price communications, for most of the period it was difficult to know how, if at all, advertising moved markets. “Does advertising increase demand for a given firm’s products?” asked Harvard Business School Professor Neil Borden in his classic 1942 text, The Economic Effects of Advertising. “Indeterminate,” he concluded. Does it preclude price competition? “In no case,” he wrote.

Advertising thus grew as a faith-based initiative, with ad agencies and clients alike believing it worked best when it raised awareness of brands and goods across a large swath of a target population, with success calculated using various survey-based input measures, such as page impressions; cost-per-thousand viewers or readers; and gross ratings points (GRPs), an indicator of audience size. Volume was the highest value. Rosser Reeves, head of the Ted Bates ad agency, voice the prevailing view this way in 1960: “If 90 percent [of the audience] do not remember it, the story is not worn out.”

With slowing economic growth during the 1970s, marketers started to reassess their laissez-faire attitude about measuring marketing performance. But it wasn’t until the 1990s and the rise of the Internet that the accountability revolution commenced. It was still in its infancy eight years ago, when Randall Rothenberg, one of the authors of this article, wrote in Wired magazine:

The new media technologies, by drastically reducing production and distribution costs and making possible almost continual and instantaneous refinements in message, promise to increase the efficiency of accountable advertising.… The spurious distinction between image advertising and retail advertising will erode, then disappear, as each advertisement, every product placement, all editorial can be tied to transactions.

Today, the accountability revolution is approaching its second stage. Marketers are more explicitly moving their strategy and spending decisions down the “purchase funnel” of consumer behavior. (See Exhibit 4.) They are no longer satisfied with media placements that merely build “top-of-the-funnel” responses from consumers (awareness and consideration). They favor media that can substantiate an ad’s influence on customer preference, purchase, and retention. This means a growing penchant for online media, especially those that can deliver a reliable indication of customer response.

Media companies are increasingly asked to go beyond reach and frequency metrics like GRPs to more tangible and quantifiable evidence of return on marketing investment. No longer do marketers ask, “What is the cost of the GRPs I am buying?” Instead, they ask, “How many toll-free calls or online registrations did that ad generate, and how many were converted into sales?” Then, as they become more sophisticated at tracking the relationship between advertising and sales, they allocate their media buys on the basis of how well their offerings drive consumers through the purchase funnel.

To gain the requisite statistics, marketers don’t simply go online; they enter their customers’ worlds. P&G’s Tremor, an in-house unit that fosters brand trial and consideration via a network of some 280,000 trend-setting teens, has proven so successful that P&G now offers its services to noncompeting marketers, including Coca-Cola and Toyota. These interactive communities of “alpha consumers” offer marketers multiple benefits. They generate buzz for new products by reaching key influencers; they bypass traditional media to connect with hard-to-engage segments (such as multitasking youth); they communicate brand messages in ways that consumers interpret as more authentic; and they deliver deep customer insights.

In our interviews with chief marketing officers and our research with the Association of National Advertisers, we were struck by the expressed need to develop more robust analytics focused on ROI and consumer insights. There was a nearly uniform desire among respondents to concentrate advertising resources on those consumers who were, as one CMO told us, “specifically in the market for my category, product, or brand.”

 
 
 
Follow Us 
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google Plus YouTube RSS strategy+business Digital and Mobile products App Store

 

Resources

  1. Des Dearlove, editor, Results-Driven Marketing: A Guide to Growth and Profits (strategy+business Books, 2005): On creating an ROI-savvy marketing department. Click here.
  2. Evan Hirsh and Mark Schweizer, “The Advertising Saturation Point,” s+b, Fall 2005: Discerning the overspend in conventional advertising budgets. Click here.
  3. Paul Hyde, Edward Landry, and Andrew Tipping, “Making the Perfect Marketer,” s+b, Winter 2004: Study from the Association of National Advertisers and Booz Allen Hamilton explores the challenges and opportunities that the media shift creates for marketing departments. Click here. 
  4. Maarten Jager and Steven Wheeler, “Building a Better Matchmaker,” s+b, Winter 2005: The future of automotive advertising starts with the dealer’s interactive “customer-sensing capability.” Click here.
  5. Paul Keegan, “The Man Who Can Save Advertising,” Business 2.0, November 1, 2004: Profiles Seth Haberman, inventor of the Visible World technology for targeting TV neighborhood by neighborhood. Click here.
  6. Nielsen//Net Ratings, “Working Women Online: Media Usage and Purchasing Habits of Online Working Women,” Washington Post/ Newsweek Interactive, 2004: The Internet as the window to the world for busy working women. Click here.
  7. Yuki Noguchi, “TV When — and Where — You Want It: New Video Technologies Free Viewers from the Couch,” Washington Post, February 12, 2006: Mark Burnett and other pundits on the “new prime times” of video-on-demand. Click here.
  8. Randall Rothenberg, “Bye-Bye,” Wired, January 1998: Looks ahead to the death of “big media.” Click here.
  9. Veronis Suhler Stevenson, “Communications Industry Forecast 2005–2009,”: Predicts growth in home video, Internet media, wireless content, and interactive TV. Click here.
  10. Mark Wallace, “The Game Is Virtual. The Profit Is Real,” New York Times, May 29, 2005: Unveils the remarkable global growth of World of Warcraft and other role-playing games.
  11. Nick Wreden, ProfitBrand: How to Increase the Profitability, Accountability, and Sustainability of Brands (Kogan Page, 2005): Cogent guide to sustaining brands in the new-media-driven “demand economy,” where customers expect their desires to be satisfied instantly.
  12. Yankelovich Partners, “2005 Marketing Receptivity Survey,”: Finds that consumers hate advertising, except the personalized kind. Click here.
  13. The Apprentice Web site, Season 2, Episode 4: Recap of the Unilever tie-in episode, in which contestants created a Dove TV commercial, after which Dove Web site traffic increased 1,500 percent. Click here.
  14. Jack Myers Media Village, www.mediavillage.com/jmr: Former CBS-TV sales executive’s Web site reports on declining TV ad sales (in May 23, 2005, archive) and other new media harbingers.
  15. For more articles on marketing, sign up for s+b’s RSS feed. Click here.