strategy+business is published by PwC Strategy& Inc.
 
or, sign in with:
strategy and business
Published: November 25, 2008

 
 

Beyond Borders: The Global Innovation 1000

According to Farashuddin, this strategy is essen­tially demand-driven, not cost-driven: “The primary reason we have facilities and engineers in emerging markets like China, India, Brazil, and the Czech Republic is because that’s where an increasing number of cars are being made and sold,” he says. “Our customers, the auto­motive manufacturers, demand engineering and technical development support for their growing emerging-market customer base.”

By 2011, he points out, China is expected to be the largest auto market in the world, and India to be the fifth-largest. It’s incumbent on his company to sell these markets while maintaining a globally competitive technology base. “In China and India,” says Farashuddin, “a lot of people who own vehicles, especially the larger vehicles, have chauffeurs, and the owners sit in the back seat. So you have to design audio systems and climate control systems so they can be controlled from the back seat, as well as from the front seat. That’s a piece of insight that you pick up only when you’re in China and India working with local engineers.”

Visteon is organized into four product lines: interiors, climate control, electronics, and lighting. Each group keeps its product development function separate. That makes them easier to manage, but significant challenges remain. Each group struggles to find and retain engineering talent around the world. Although the talent pools outside North America and Europe are growing rapidly, wages are rising along with the talent. Meanwhile, in these other countries, local players are building out their own R&D facilities, so local engineers have more choices about where to work. That’s made it more difficult for companies like Visteon to retain talent — a problem that is exacerbated, Farashuddin believes, by the growing sense of national pride local engineers feel in working for homegrown automotive firms.

As auto sales in emerging markets increase, the auto industry will continue to move R&D to these markets. Our analysis shows that China is already the largest importer of automotive R&D, and its share will keep growing. Tough as the auto business is, however, the goal is no longer simply to cut costs. Farashuddin likes to use the term “automotive intellect” to describe the knowledge gained through the process of designing cars and the components that go into them. Until recently, the flow of automotive intellect has been going from the West to the emerging markets. But, says Farashuddin, “there’s a lot of automotive intellect that’s being gen­erated now in the emerging markets, and you have to be in these markets to stay on top of your game. And five years from now, you’ll see some leading technology being developed first in India or China, and flowing back to the West.”

Computing and Electronics: Bright Ideas
Unlike cars, the same computing and electronics products can be sold in just about any market, with little regard for local needs and tastes. That’s why, unlike the auto industry, the C&E sector is motivated less by demand and more by the search for talent and new ideas. To that end, companies worldwide are spreading their R&D resources across a wide swath of the globe, in both developed and emerging markets.

Overall, 252 C&E companies that made the Global Innovation 1000 this year led those in all other industries in terms of raw dollars invested in R&D; in 2007, the industry spent $142 billion, or 29 percent of the total. That figure is up 8.5 percent from the year before, although R&D spending as a percentage of sales re­mained the same, at 7 percent, about in line with the sector’s average R&D intensity over the past five years. Among the 50 C&E companies we analyzed closely, the U.S. was, again, the largest “net exporter” of R&D spending, at $16.9 billion, while China was the largest “importer,” taking in $14.3 billion. The U.K. and India imported about $5.5 and $6.8 billion, respectively, while fourth-ranked Israel took in $4.9 billion — indicating that R&D in this sector is spread much more evenly between developed and emerging nations. Indeed, R&D in the C&E sector as a whole is significantly more diversified than it is in the auto sector. Fully 70 percent of the sector’s R&D spending originates in just the U.S. and Japan, yet only 40 percent of spending takes place in those two countries. The rest is spread among more than 20 different countries.

 
 
 
Follow Us 
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google Plus YouTube RSS strategy+business Digital and Mobile products App Store

 

Resources

  1. Vinay Couto and Arie Y. Lewin, Next Generation Offshoring: The Globalization of Innovation (Duke Center for International Business Education and Research, 2007): Examines trends in global offshoring practices and analyzes why and how companies go about globalizing innovation and seeking talent globally, and what challenges they face.
  2. Vinay Couto, Arie Lewin, Mahadeva Mani, and Vikas Sehgal, “Offshoring the Brains as Well as the Brawn,” Booz & Company/Duke Center for International Business Education and Research, July 2008: Shows how providers of outsourcing services are increasingly performing innovation work, such as new product development and R&D.
  3. Kevin Dehoff and Vikas Sehgal, “Innovators without Borders,” s+b, Autumn 2006: Provides comprehensive insight into the market for offshored engineering and technical services.
  4. Thomas L. Friedman, The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005): Bestseller analyzing the progress of globalization with an emphasis on geo-economic trends.
  5. Thomas Goldbrunner, Yves Doz, Keeley Wilson, and Steven Veldhoen, “The Well-Designed Global R&D Network,” s+b Resilience Report, 05/15/06: A study of cross-boundary innovation networks worldwide showing low-cost, high-value ways they can be designed.
  6. Barry Jaruzelski and Kevin Dehoff, “The Customer Connection: The Global Innovation 1000,” s+b, Winter 2007: The 2007 study, identifying two primary success factors in innovation strategy: aligning the innovation model to corporate strategy and listening to customers every step of the way.
  7. Barry Jaruzelski, Kevin Dehoff, and Rakesh Bordia, “Smart Spenders: The Global Innovation 1000,” s+b, Winter 2006: The 2006 study, uncovering a small group of high-leverage innovators who outperform their industries.
  8. Barry Jaruzelski, Kevin Dehoff, and Rakesh Bordia, “Money Isn’t Everything: The Global Innovation 1000,” s+b, Winter 2005: The 2005 study, revealing the value of an innovation dollar — and the basics of a better strategy.
  9. For more articles on innovation, sign up for s+b’s RSS feed.
 
Close