Consultation via Collaboration
When management consultants stop being experts and start being collaborators, companies benefit.
What if We Shifted the Basis of Consulting from Knowledge to Knowing?
(Subscription or fee required.)
Jeff Hicks, Padmakumar Nair, and Celeste P. M. Wilderom
Management Learning, vol. 40, no. 3
Companies should consider making a fundamental shift in the way they think about management consulting, according to the authors of this paper. The current preference is for expert-based “knowledge,” meaning that consultants act as advisors to clients, providing outside diagnoses of problems. In many cases, these consultants’ suggestions are based on a well-defined body of academic and third-party research, but not necessarily on firsthand experience with the challenges faced. The consulting approach of “knowing” is more hands-on, involving close cooperation with the client company. One of the advantages of this method, the authors stress, is that information about a given business, industry sector, or project is not merely transferred from consultants to clients, but rather created during a process of active collaboration. When problems crop up, argue the authors, the collaborators have a mutual incentive to solve them — an approach that ultimately spreads more information, accountability, and knowledge throughout the entire team.
Companies will benefit if management consultants shift their focus away from the traditional expert-driven approach and instead explore collaborative client–consultant projects.