skip to main content skip to main navigation
(originally published by Booz & Company)

Evening the Playing Field for Investors

Regulation Fair Disclosure has curbed selective disclosure of private information in the United States.

Sell Side School Ties

Andrea Frazzini, Christopher J. Malloy, and Lauren H. Cohen

Harvard Business School, Finance Working Paper No. 08-074

Date Published:
February 2008

Do equity analysts make more positive recommendations on a company’s stock when they share an alma mater with the executives or directors of that company? The data indicates that they did before the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission passed Regulation Fair Disclosure (FD) in 2000. That regulation prohibits firms from disclosing information selectively — for instance, providing private information to analysts who share a formal or informal alumni network with executives or directors. Before Regulation FD, a portfolio strategy of relying on “buy” recommendations from analysts with school ties to executives would have yielded an 8.16 percent return. After the regulation, however, that return fell to 0 percent. In the U.K., where Regulation FD does not apply, analysts’ educational ties are still strong predictors of their recommendations’ accuracy.

Bottom Line:
Regulation FD has curbed selective disclosure of private information in the United States. However, in U.K. markets, it is still possible to use analysts’ alumni networks as a proxy for their access to private information.


Get s+b's award-winning newsletter delivered to your inbox. Sign up No, thanks
People flying while reading a newsletter

Get the strategy+business newsletter delivered to your inbox